White Papers
El presente estudio comparativo analiza las tres principales bases de datos bibliográficas multidisciplinares, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus y OpenAlex, con el objetivo de proporcionar evidencia actualizada sobre cobertura, calidad de metadatos y características funcionales que permita orientar decisiones estratégicas en evaluación científica.
This book is addressed to researchers, academics, and science policy-makers who are interested in the quantitative analysis of scientific information. Its principal aim is to explore the field of bibliometrics, tracing its historical development and highlighting its transformative impact on academic evaluation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14672066
This literature review examines the use of informetric methods to assess diversity in the scientific workforce, highlighting advances in author name disambiguation and individual-level metrics evaluation. It emphasizes the shift towards multidimensional models that account for diverse characteristics such as gender and ethnicity, suggesting future research pathways for equitable evaluation frameworks. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13880355
This paper reviews the main bibliometric approaches and findings reported in the scientific literature with regard to gender in science. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12636223